US opposes ICC probe into Israel, Palestinians; weighs maintaining sanctions

State Department spokesman says Palestinians aren’t sovereign state and therefore can’t delegate jurisdiction to The Hague, says decision ‘unfairly’ targets Israel

From The Time Of Israel
Demonstrators carry banners and Palestinian flags outside the International Criminal Court, ICC, urging the court to prosecute Israel’s army for war crimes in The Hague, Netherlands, Friday, Nov. 29, 2019. The ICC prosecutor was directed to reconsider her decision to not pursue charges in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla case. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)

Media www.rajawalisiber.com  The Biden administration “firmly” opposes the International Criminal Court’s decision to open an investigation into alleged war crimes committed by Israel and the Palestinians, but is still weighing whether to maintain sanctions against the body imposed by the Trump administration, the US State Department spokesperson said Wednesday.

“We firmly oppose and are disappointed by the ICC prosecutor’s announcement of an investigation into the Palestinian situation,” said Ned Price at his daily press briefing.

“We will continue to uphold our strong commitment to Israel and to its security, including by opposing actions that seek to target Israel unfairly,” he added, insisting that the ICC does not have jurisdiction over the matter as Israel is not party to the Rome Statute. (The Palestinians have been since 2014.)

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken later echoed these points.

Like Israel, the US is also not a member of the ICC and has found itself at odds with The Hague-based international court due to its ongoing probe into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan by Afghan forces, the Taliban as well as the American military. In 2019, US President Donald Trump imposed economic sanctions and visa travel restrictions against chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, who made Wednesday’s announcement as well as one of her aides.

Asked whether the Biden administration would keep those sanctions in place, the State Department spokesman said, “much as we disagree with the ICC’s actions… we are thoroughly reviewing sanctions… as we determine our next steps.”

“The Palestinian do not qualify as a sovereign state, and therefore are not qualified to obtain membership as a state or to participate as a state or to delegate jurisdiction to the ICC,” added Price.

The State Department spokesman noted Bensouda’s clarification that her office would need to assess priorities and resources before determining when and how to proceed, indicating hope that the decision could still be walked back or limited in scope.

“The United States is always taken the position that the court’s jurisdiction should be reserved for countries that consent to it or that are referred by the UN Security Council,” Price said.

Asked whether the Biden administration would keep those sanctions in place, the State Department spokesman said, “much as we disagree with the ICC’s actions… we are thoroughly reviewing sanctions… as we determine our next steps.”

“The Palestinian do not qualify as a sovereign state, and therefore are not qualified to obtain membership as a state or to participate as a state or to delegate jurisdiction to the ICC,” added Price.

The State Department spokesman noted Bensouda’s clarification that her office would need to assess priorities and resources before determining when and how to proceed, indicating hope that the decision could still be walked back or limited in scope.

“The United States is always taken the position that the court’s jurisdiction should be reserved for countries that consent to it or that are referred by the UN Security Council,” Price said.

“The investigation will cover crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court that are alleged to have been committed in the situation since 13 June 2014, the date to which reference is made in the referral of the situation to my office,” said Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda in a statement.

“Any investigation undertaken by the office will be conducted independently, impartially and objectively, without fear or favor.”

The June 13, 2014, date is significant. Palestinian terrorists kidnapped and murdered three Israeli teenagers in the Gush Etzion area of the West Bank the day before. By asking for an investigation beginning on June 13, the Palestinians ensured that the ICC will not look into the killing of Eyal Yifrach, Gil-ad Shaer, and Naftali Fraenkel.

From left to right: Eyal Yifrach, 19, Gil-ad Shaer, 16, and Naftali Fraenkel, 16, three Israeli teenagers who were seized and killed by Palestinians on June 12, 2014 (photo credit: IDF/AP)

She noted her previous refusal to investigate Israel for war crimes over the Mavi Marmara raid in 2010. “In the current situation, however, there is a reasonable basis to proceed and there are admissible potential cases.”

Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip, welcomed the decision by the ICC.

However, the terror organization is directly implicated in the alleged war crimes the tribunal seeks to investigate. In its statement, a Hamas spokesperson defended the group’s actions as “legitimate resistance” against Israel.

In June, Bensouda will be replaced by British lawyer Karim Khan, who has the ability to close down the investigation if he chooses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *